2024, Vol. 5, Issue 2, Part A
Legal and ethical implications of misinformation: A comparative study of regulatory approaches in the European Union and the United States
Author(s): Oluwasegun Olakoyenikan
Abstract: The rise of misinformation has significant legal and ethical implications, influencing public trust, social stability, and democratic processes. This study provides a comparative analysis of regulatory approaches to misinformation in the European Union (EU) and the United States (US), highlighting key differences in their legal and ethical frameworks. The EU’s regulatory stance, marked by proactive content moderation and platform accountability, contrasts with the US’s emphasis on free speech protections under the First Amendment and Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. By examining these divergent approaches, the study identifies the strengths and weaknesses of each framework and explores the broader implications for policymakers seeking to mitigate the impact of misinformation. The analysis suggests that a balanced, hybrid regulatory approach could more effectively address the challenges posed by misinformation, fostering both accountability and the preservation of fundamental rights. Future research is recommended to explore global standards and best practices to combat misinformation across diverse legal landscapes.
Pages: 21-26 | Views: 42 | Downloads: 22
Download Full Article: Click Here
How to cite this article:
Oluwasegun Olakoyenikan. Legal and ethical implications of misinformation: A comparative study of regulatory approaches in the European Union and the United States. International Journal of Advanced Mass Communication and Journalism. 2024; 5(2): 21-26.